AI Copilots for Analysis, Not Autopilots for Judgment
AI can synthesize survey responses, market behavior, and cash‑flow patterns into plain‑language summaries of risk comfort. But the conversation—values, fears, trade‑offs—remains human. Would you trust an AI‑generated risk summary if your advisor reviewed it live with you? Tell us why or why not.
AI Copilots for Analysis, Not Autopilots for Judgment
Monte Carlo projections and what‑if comparisons now run instantly, letting meetings focus on decisions instead of waiting. Advisors explore early retirement, career breaks, or education costs interactively. Which scenario should we model in a future post? Suggest one and we’ll analyze it together.
AI Copilots for Analysis, Not Autopilots for Judgment
Recommendations must show their logic: data inputs, assumptions, and sensitivity to changes. Advisors validate reasoning and document why a choice fits a client’s priorities. What level of transparency would make you comfortable with AI‑assisted advice? Share your threshold for clarity and comfort.